ADC Development: The Questions Running in the Background

You’ve had food stuck in your teeth at some point during a conversation you thought was going well. Or toilet paper trailing from the back of your shoe on a day you felt particularly put together. Maybe you’ve even forgotten to color in your very blonde eyebrows and spent the rest of the day looking like someone erased the top half of your face. But you had no idea. You’re walking around with the quiet, complete confidence of someone operating on incomplete information.

You weren’t wrong about anything you could see. You just couldn’t see everything, which is a different problem than getting a bad result. A bad result tells you something is wrong, but this doesn’t. This happens in the lab too. The number is clean, the program is advancing, and somewhere in the data, something is happening that your readout has no way to show you.

ADC development has a version of this problem. The cytotoxicity readout is real, reliable, and correct. It’s also an aggregate, and an aggregate compresses everything that happened into a single number. That number can’t tell you which mechanisms produced it, which ones are underperforming, or what to change if the program stops working. It just tells you cells died, or they didn’t. You’re walking around with the quiet, complete confidence of someone operating on incomplete information.

Cytotoxicity: Where Every Program Begins

Cell viability assays were built to answer one question: did the cells die? Increase the dose, more cells die. Decrease it, fewer do. The curve is clean, the data is reliable, and the payload is doing what it was designed to do. For cytotoxicity, it’s the right question to ask.

That question has an established platform with consistent, reproducible data: our CellTiter-Glo® and RealTime-Glo™ Assays.

For most ADC programs, this is where the measurement work starts and stops, but it should only be where it starts. The question they answer well is only one of several your ADC is raising. The number means what it says, but the question it answers has a boundary, and the boundary leaves you with an incomplete picture.

Continue reading “ADC Development: The Questions Running in the Background”

Reprogramming T Cells with DCA: A Metabolic Breakthrough

T cell-based immunotherapies, including CAR-T and TCR-T therapies, have transformed cancer treatment.

T cell-based immunotherapies, including CAR-T and TCR-T therapies, have transformed cancer treatment. T cells are a type of white blood cell that plays a central role in the immune system, recognizing and eliminating abnormal or infected cells. These therapies train T cells to attack tumors; however, a major hurdle remains: most lab-grown T cells fail to persist after an infusion in a patient. Despite transferring millions of tumor-targeting cells, many quickly die off, limiting their effectiveness inside the body. But why?

Continue reading “Reprogramming T Cells with DCA: A Metabolic Breakthrough”

Dynein Motor Proteins Could Be the Moving Power Behind Cancer Metastasis

3D Cancer Cell

“The cancer has spread.” are perhaps some of the most frightening words for anyone touched by cancer. It means that cancer cells have migrated away from the primary tumor, invaded health tissues and firmed secondary tumors. Called metastasis, this event is the deadliest feature of any type of cancer (1). The cellular mechanisms that play a role in metastasis could serve as powerful therapeutic targets. Unfortunately, understanding of these mechanisms is limited. However, some studies have suggested a link between the dysregulation of microtubule motors and cancer progression. A new study by a team from Penn State has revealed that the motor protein dynein plays a pivotal role in the movement of metastatic breast cancer cells through two model systems simulating soft tissues (1).

Continue reading “Dynein Motor Proteins Could Be the Moving Power Behind Cancer Metastasis”