Here is another tidbit for thought from the Science Writing in the Age of Denial conference. The first keynote address was given by Dr. Arthur Lupia, from the University of Michigan. His talk entitled “Communicating Science in Politicized Environments” focused on the physiological mechanisms of learning and the evidence from the social sciences about how people learn and make decisions when they have limited knowledge of a subject. During his talk he presented a 1-minute story synopsis of his “main point”, in the hopes that if we came away with anything from the talk, we would, at the very least, remember this story. Here is my sketched version of his story with notes.
What do you think? Do scientists and science writers do a good enough job of knowing where our audience is when we write?
Latest posts by Michele Arduengo (see all)
- Catalyzing Solutions with Synthetic Biology - May 17, 2018
- Orchestrating the Genome: Final Thoughts for #HumanGenomeMonth - April 30, 2018
- The Age of the Genome: Commercial DNA Sequencing, Familial Searching and What We Are Learning - April 16, 2018